LOOKING FORWARD TO POSITIVE CHANGE:
1. First labour budget will hit the employment rate. First, we make sure that some observations are set straight. A tax relief goes through the account of the employer who usually pays the tax, harassing the employer to increase wage only increases unemployment and inflation accounting wage plus tax passed into the price of products always. Business will account “price of products” including new tax and new costs always. Labour has a list of lies they keep saying whenever you'll give them a microphone: (a) job keeper payment did not increase anyone's income only saved jobs had no effect on inflation. It was the only way to keep the economy running. (b) in the past decade of liberal time real wage was always positively going over inflation as per record, (c) labour is making temporary global inflation permanent with a false panic to increase the minimum wage to add more inflations into the economy at the first step, then they will start marketing their child care policy which had no practical demand in the market. Reserve bank data confirms people end up in a surplus in savings end of the pandemic as various outgoing expenses were restricted. Reserve Bank was taking off all emergency setups end of the pandemic. There was no case against people entering into new debts to fund child care and make everyone including businesses pay for the new inflation(s) created by labour policies. Literally, everyone will do some extra jobs to pay for extra inflations created by labour. It is always the govt stimulus that temporarily resolves inflationary pressure while business fixes the problems of the supply chain and temporary issues which goes off. (d) energy policy must be diversified to give all investors access to the market other than harassing and forcing them to get into an $ 80 billion burden for no reason. Majority-people never agreed to transition up to the present. (e) Labour has a very opportunistic approach where we experienced already how the liberals dealt with labour debts by cutting costs and balancing the budget. Labour is keep taking more debt recklessly, we all know the budget is in deficit now, all new policies coming with debts or new tax. End of the pandemic, the only issue had which might attract some new debts would be the crisis in health services ongoing from the pandemic might not be permanent in the long run. It is basically the job of states who has their own individual structures of debts. There was nothing else during the 2022 election which could possibly attract any debts. I have given some indication in the following paragraphs that economy usually does not notice up to 3% inflation in their regular lives. The 2% inflation in the notice that we saw wasn’t exactly everywhere in the market and was nothing to panic about as the temporary relieves should go to the appropriate locations until it was fixed other than pushing it to 7% to put and make 4% in the notice. (f) existing child care support was adequate for the whole past decade given the fact that there was no war or global inflation/recession in place. Liberal policies landed the economy in strong growth and surplus in the household to cope with the global crisis where stimulus via tax reliefs, relief in medication other services were not inflationary at all. Labour is just trying to sell their childcare policy by fueling inflations in various policies like minimum wage increase in an incompatible fashion. There is no confusion that labour's distribution of an extra $6billon or so will only attract some rich if they were really up for it in reality. I must include the fact that liberals proposing to ease as a real change. I do not have any idea how "AUSTRALIAN CAN DO BETTER" become a slogan of labour ???!!! Anyone with a commonsense can tell that the taxpayer's money will pay for welfare, and all other development projects will take steps with surplus or not. Only stupids will fund welfare with debts. The economy is not stuck, why you must take loans for infrastructures that you can't afford? Make them as slow as possible to increase affordability, every loan has an affordability test, borrowers must have their own measures to avoid becoming victims. (e) labour will have to come up with more lies to hide continuous inflation fueled by their policies and budget. (f) cash injection in business from the liberal policy was spent into the market to grow the economy, and extend the market, jobs, sells. Cash injection into personal income harassing business will similarly spend in the economy into the inflation only, will not buy anything extra or will not increase equity of a person rather will put the job market in jeopardy to fund the extra money under harassment. No policy will be able to show any practical benefit to consumers other than losing some jobs and the permanent increase in the price of most products. You must remember that when there is a race in-between wage and inflation, inflation will always win as I have shown you in the account. We call it an “efficient market” in the capitalist economy. If you start harassing a community out of fashion that harassment will be spread into the whole economy to make everyone suffer. If you say, you are not out of fashion then the economy will tell you the same thing, let everyone suffer more, that's not out of fashion. Why don't you give up your income, like the fashion established in the culture? Then look at how Australians can do better and grow the economy for the past 10 years. You are not cleaver than the economy itself. They start by sacking people if they see the slightest decline in profit. If business starts seeing loss, all the jobs you do become worthless. It is clear that labour targeted all uneducated people in the country to get their votes with complete lies as the stubborn media was enjoying making people foolish with them. The tax relief offer from liberals was the money low-income earners must have seen in their bank account end of the year. (g) Given the clean environment and adequate health services in Australia, the ratio of aging population is increasing at an alarming rate for the past 20 years. Industries like age care, child care, heath services already struggling to cope with the labour shortage. Now, labour policy is continuing to increase pressure, inflation in the subsidise industries with taxpayer's money and infinite debts to put the whole generation of Australians into servent carrier mainly. On the other hand, the energy policy will break the backbone of the economy giving up the most valuable resource fossil fuels. Anyone can clearly see the future of the majority of Australians to clean human stool as a permanent full-time carrier will be only possible to fund by infinite debts. In Marxism, this is called the “mode of production”. Countries stick to the most natural version of it without distraction. Ex: if you keep subsiding child care to make it universal it will destroy the natural balance of family and its dependency structure will keep increasing more elders into aged care. Child care is universal inside the family not on the street or in orphanages. Labour will come up with new lies that they are creating jobs not infinite debts against tax payer’s money. Labour will keep increasing debts and budget deficits and keep undermining the real development project taken by liberals to repair the budget and lift the economy without further debt. Only uneducated people will not notice how their future is aligned in the bush to watch renewable ceiling fans on hot days. Some liers will advise that mining is recoverable via more investment in agriculture. The reality is in all developed countries including US, every year huge amount of food going to recycle because it doesn't worth exporting with no visible market. All labour policies are designed to pick up some extra tax from people in various dirty tricks, force employers to pay extra salary which will attract more tax for govt, the price will increase will attract more GST, parents will be forced into extra hours to pay marginal tax @ higher income; declaration for extra subsidy in child care will increase child care cost straight away, now where is actually the extra hours? All these harassments are designed to impute some tax for the government on the price of all products. No one will see no extra thing in their shopping bag, will work like slaves. Well, you’ll find some slaves who will tell you that none of this came with a big pile of new loans to pay off to run this process.
Ex: 1.8 mil ppl will pay extra tax@30c for $1 increase per hour salary+ GST@10c for $1 increase in every product+ upcoming new tax= secured income for govt will generate infinite amount of years vs. average $1000 a year extra in child care to approximate 1mil ppl in a year in average + $2000 a year extra to 1.8mil ppl. VS. useful life of employment 50+50 years on average per couple: average number of children is 2 per family for average 6 years child care support for per 2 persons working. Grand total = few billions hand out to the government as implementation cost per year with the slogan "help labour, help families".
Ex: tax offset + tax relief to all that they can spend extra everywhere including child care. No increase in price anywhere, if people are saving banks will lend them to investments will attract more tax for govt. No profit no loss to the government. We will see clear progress in the economy with no lash of debt every second in the budget.
Ex: a couple @$100k yearly salary can put $100k deposit to buy their home in average 3-4 years. You must welcome some junk heads who can’t manage their family account and keep harassing the whole population to hand out the government @exponential rate every year. The extra money a couple will pay every year, if they put that amount on a bank account for two years and that will accumulate the money they will get extra for child care.
Ex: this is extreme discrimination against people when more than half of the expense for renewable establishment is claimed from people to sell energy @ likely to be a higher price which people paying now. Where is the account to prove renewable is cheaper? In practical, the price is more than double. If you have a sense to understand the above ex: implementation costs charged by a government for a specific development, you must understand you are paying far more than the cost you should pay for those so-called “infrastructure”. Govt will keep lying to people to pick up more jobs and more income standing on the shoulders of hard-working people. If you also have the sense to see all energy companies establishing new renewable plants at their cost must maintain the price of the energy in the market competition delivering energy far cheaper than paying half of the price to the government for infrastructure to get energy @ even same price like now. Well if you are blind and stubborn you’ll give this job to the government. I’m guaranteeing you that there is no mistake in my calculation that people will pay more than double the price of the actual renewable price they are paying now to companies like AGL and other for the renewable energy they have at present. Govt is calling it "transitions cost" to make the process hypothetically faster looking theoretically impossible at present to most of the parliamentarians.
Ex: now if you understand the word reality, I'll make you see it now. Why living in developed countries becoming so difficult gradually? why one full-time job is not enough for a life most people wanna live? Why overall people becoming more unsocial and more revengeful? Why raising personal wealth at the individual level becoming more and more difficult? Because the "ruling class" is working together against junk-heads slaves end of the day. Every person pays more than 30% of their income, and every business is paying more than 35% of their income to mainly expand the operation and control of the ruling class whether necessary or not because you are a junk-head and can't decide what is necessary. They keep asking for more money out of your pocket, and you think you are developing somewhere. If you care to read my “CLIMATE FRAUD” page which I have summarised a few issues on this page, you will understand which are the people you are dealing with.
Ex: unlike capitalist economists, there are Marxist economic theories that clearly suggest "medium tech" and "medium investments" to keep most businesses under the ownership of citizens is the best way to fight capitalism or multinationals which is the most advanced form of capitalism.
Ex: it is necessary to see capitalism in its clear visible present form. 300 years of colonial history evident to all social scientists that Europe (British + French + others ) stolen wealth from India + Latin America + Africa to build Europe and their settlements like US+Australia which is given “birth of poverty” in the world then formed UN who named them underdeveloped countries. Now the stolen money formed some monetary agencies like IMF, World bank and sanctioned to the poor to borrow their own wealth from Europe to survive in poverty. The money they make from regular trade doesn’t pay for their budget taking loans in trillions every year.
Ex: if it is not clear enough I must conclude, only a perverted opportunistic government like labour will try to impute tax inside price and income at a time of unprecedented inflation. It is common sense that if business wanna sacrifice profit they will sacrifice it in the price of the product. The only sensible and effective approach govt can take is give away their income back to the economy via subsidies in the inflationary products to help poorest. Not increasing minimum wage to keep fuelling inflation to 10%.
2. By end of the year labour will start blaming global inflation. (In Australian economy up to 3% inflation taken to be normal always adjusted automatically in most regulated salary packages). Wages may pick to historical as it is flourishing the full capacity in the labour market from liberal establishment must finish existing projects. Reserve bank already predicted from data that there was no hidden mistake in liberal policy. Only independence can under-pine long-term solutions against the global nature of inflation where labour doesn't have any practical viable steps giving up independent assets unwisely. There are more magics to reveal in the energy market given the clear shift[s] in the international market. None of these shifts will give long-term benefits by giving up independent assets. I must add, labour was almost winning seating in parliament that gradually increasing taxes was the main job of the government in various innovative ways never turned back anywhere when they found any opportunity. UNTILL liberals arrested those crimes at every level of administration and the budget shrinked government to a perfect balance counting population and state government’s independence. What else you can develop in a developed country to pick some leader and money out of it. Nothing other than bulldozing existing establishments, breaking the backbones of the economy and the future of the population. I had a list of diseases from dust from a doctor like silicosis, abestosis... I don't think any stupid will pay to plaster the whole world pulling trees from dust. States will show magics in global crisis forgetting normal days accounting loss every day in energy bills however you generate it. There is no confusion that the price of fossil fuel will keep increasing until Russia is back in the market, and they definitely will. As an example: selling things @higher price and then giving handouts to the poor country may become less effective when Russia offers discounts on commodities minus the extreme discrimination in dollar price. A lot of people can see Europe went through the Marxist revolution for some part of their lives and the French election seemed to raise the question already. The reality is Marxism has various forms of application in various countries, is a grand theory, claims to have a ready solution for every problem doesn’t get into infinite experiments like capitalism. The idea we know as capitalism was one of Karl Marx’s invention in the theory of historical materialism. I don’t ignore the most powerful reality that no country in the world will give up their most valuable natural resource fossil fuel. That’s absolutely impossible but some countries are reserving them to become rich in future or waiting to become technologically independent to explore them or open them. Superstitious and less educated country like Australia will stand in the front of export market only. Anyone will see pressure from foreign investors/explorer to generate profit from others. Ex: Marxism exports things when you have surplus, so, the domestic market never faces global inflation or a crisis of supply to pay the price @international market for all products. Here economists will show you some juggling about reserve and bullshit. The question is why domestic market will pay higher price for the energy what we already have? There is no increase in demand in domestics market. What capitalism will do is will start harassing whole business community with various ideas to adjust the situation. Where we stand here in any kind of economy is domestic market pays lower price on their resources by nature of lease (oil, gas, coal) given to the miners, there cannot be any situation when public pays to business for improvements. If public funding any improvement business must pay it off by instalments which must be visible in the transaction(s) not in hypothetical price. There are countries where energy market is wholly owned by public with 100% share. I simply had a quick look at the present situation that 69% people did not vote for labour means they are not sitting on any trust from people. If liberal orders for a royal commission to establish there is no CO2 in Australian air will make an end of labour politics forever. I can guarantee that it won’t take more than a year of observation to establish that no CO2 is flying in Australian air which is claimed to be causing temperature increase in everyday reading of temperature in populated locations. All emissions can be switched of for a month or so to make this observation possible. I have already given a similar kind of research result in the following which is taken to be accurate science in the industries always. I'm not seeing any point to take reading of temperature below 0 degree and below 0 density where CO2 either travelling to the infinite galaxy or traveling to the oceans then sinking in cold places by nature. According to natural science, you keep entering new worlds in the galaxy with different temperatures, densities, pressure, speed of air with enormous difference in quality of sun light when you travel upward or when you enter the oceans. No one should tumble up all natural science and keep lying to people. I must repeat, air flow is designed to push air upward to keep the world cool on the sunny days. Sun has it's own axis to spin in with fluctuation of temperature.
3. Steps on renewable will start attracting more households for solar plants. To be realistic, no one wanna pay bill every month which will keep changing and going up as a very normal process of economy. This is not more than commonsense that if solarisation of household and small business become more successful, energy provider will close the coal powered stations first. The biggest coal power energy station in Australia is closing now already. Few other issues are already established in the business in liberal period that Australian made hydrogen powered vehicles doesn’t need massive infrastructure spending doesn’t end up a pile of extra wast like battery, once CO2 quarantine technology will be implemented to quarantine carbon from factories to use in other manufacturing, none of the coal power stations will be closing, likely to be increase price of coal in the export market. It is more likely to be the situation that no one is willing to import renewable mostly from China won’t close any coal powered stations in future. In practical, Australian business have one simple question, if you are so serious about climate, why you are giving carbon credit to China to build new establishments standing at immaterial emission always. Most funny step of labour is claiming that pacific nations hate white skin because of climate change, but will make pacts with China who is the biggest emitter in the world. Any stupid should know aboriginal history of white skin never going to go off. It is just a trick to pick up some more money from Australia with utterly bullshit. If you distribute Australian emissions per square KM you will see all pacific nations have higher emissions than Australia. You can literally fit "five Europs" inside Australia that you understand where do you live and look at emissions of Europe to get back in sense. If you understand ethnicity of people you can say looking at the face that Australian first settlers came from Asia and India by boat not many years before British came. If you look at face of Eskimo, Redindians in US you won't have confusion to understand that they came from Japan by boat. India had trade with Ottoman Empire from the beginning of history and their ancestors invented boat to travel in Mediterranean Sea. People used to walk from india to Anatolia for trade. China, India have boat base culture and economy from the beginning of the history. The boats/ships we saw on the ocean from Europe those came after India and Asia. I would take “Great Wall of China (500BC)” a pick hour and “Silk Route (200BC)” to understand when it started. The way people arrived in Indonesian and Malaysia, same way to Australia.
4. Renewable spending will start seeing long term loss in debts. When labour claims 45% reduction in world’s 1% carbon footprint by 2030 making them some kind of leader in aboriginal communities, it makes them laughing storks (foolish white man) only even if they achieve net zero tomorrow. Everyone can see a massive increase in vehicle expenses likely to be go Europe if government starts pushing people to think about battery. It will go from the pocket of overall population absolutely unnecessary pressure to the households. How a government can plan to ruine future of fuel industry with an assumption, there could be 10K jobs in battery manufacturing which will actually come from potential closure of other car serving industry is zero progress. UNTILL Australian can manufacture the whole vehicle including fuel in Australia it is better to rely on some cheaper green vehicles coming from Asia. There is already a deficiency in inhouse petroleum supply in Australia only which should be replaced by alternative of fissile fuel. Battery in vehicle is designed for countries who have higher dependency on petroleum import, the price of petroleum literally can control the whole market inflation for an importer. Australia will have ZERO progress with absolute negative impact and massive cash loss in transition from petroleum. We should look at population in Europe, Australia is no where near comparable with their economy to make decisions in this type of industries. If anything can make the economy better should be thinking about stamping back high tech green petroleum car manufacturing industry and buy nothing from no one. There must be more progressive oil refinery industry under government ownership to ablolish any farthest future which could possibly introduce pollution doesn't exist in Australia. South Australia is literally floating on petroleum probably yet to open those minefields. What transparent here is labour is bringing emission/economy problems of Europ and Asia into Australia and making Australian suffer from a disease not a dream.
5. Budget will start feeling pressure to fund child care and other. I don’t see any poor making extra income leaving their own child to someone else’s hand. Paid parental leave (shared between man women) will be very close to solve problem in some bigger business setup. Still, some shortfall in 5 year time of child should be better to save via tax reliefs other than isolating children from parents and force parents to avoid the unavoidable job to raise the children end of the day. Admitting the fact that child care is a problem for low-medium income earner. A lot of households including Australian "legacy of family business" usually adopt the business to raise child in the authentic pattern of family. The artificial change we are looking at is called "capitalisation of women for the benefits of ruling class" where women are leaders willingly. It will gradually make women more vulnerable in the family increasing arguments and likely to be shortfall in the more critical times ahead factoring money for child care job that every parent can and should do. I can't see how politicians can make a mother work when her brain remains connected with the child for a year without capitalising women. Paid parental leave for the male parent should be the second year of the child if we still believe in science, not capitalism. I do not believe any politician will become successful to establish two full year paid parental leave for parents doing job in certain industrial setups. Well, left over will be very small business employees may apply for paid parental leave for their employees to the government. If you ask me how to implement the plan in reality? I won't spend any money or any brain at all, I'll ask the business to let me know how much tax relief was making it good each year. I must also include "subsidy for mirage" which will pay a cost to poor people who don't have money to get married. Well, if you ask a mature politician, they will give a list of benefits from this basically from the perspectives of present women agenda. This is absolutely bogus when the media allegedly states liberals undermined women anywhere in the structure or function. I'll give some examples below to make sense. How labour will deal with the issue of child care ? First of all they will account how much extra tax they will get if some people work extra hours which is one of the main targets to increase revenue of govt, secondly for their entire life that will also increase the revenue of the government, labour will pick up some more from companies to make sure no in the society can trace out that the proposal was to help parents to raise the children not to force parents to leave their own child to increase income and vote of the government. Well, there are stupid people like this in society who just wanna see some rebate in childcare will OK with losing control over income for the rest of their lives. The proposal I made that will give no profit of no loss to the government absolutely will help households to raise their children.
6. New tax will reveal more inflation accounting extra money in the market. Labour’s pay rise policy is to make some temporary inflations permanent in the economy to show those inflations came from liberals; not from the global crisis. The pay rise comes normally in an economy settled by a "third umpire (FWC)" and doesn’t make any temporary inflation permanent. Well, as stated above up to 3% inflation is taken to be normal in the Australian economy.
7. Poor will start realising the increase in rebates going to the pocket of the rich only. One clear case labour has against liberal: labour wants to keep 7-8% ppl unemployed in the economy, then give them public housing to buy their vote. Practically they become drug addicts and prostitutes at some points of their lives. Good thing is, it will increase the demand for govt services exactly how labour was managing boat to employ Australians with blood on their hands.
8. Putin’s success will feed breath some countries to their ease to admit aggressions of rotten US discourses.
9. At some point west won’t able to hide those propaganda from the media.
10. CHINA, INDIA wont see profit doing business with Australia, US ,EU gradually as it is clear that Putin is determined to leave US and most parts of Europe.
11. Labour will be a genius if they keep taking loans to feed broken relations with China.
12. Giving 5% tax relief to S&M business will look better than giving $60billiob cash out??!!
13. Following Russia, lots of other countries will think about cutting them off from www (world wide web). As an example, only Australians are losing a couple of billions a year from online cheating.
14. By the time people will ask ASIA to reduce carbon emissions, it will become clear to everyone that the whole global warming propaganda is a 100% bogus US tool of aggression only. They are begging to make some record of reduction in emission that end of second-century people don't through rotten tomato at them.
15. I don’t see any prospect to undermine PUTIN who is literally eating up a whole country in Europe. He did not enter like a thief won't be leaving like evicted.
16. The percentage of the primary vote in 2022 gives impressions that Australia will never come out of US external colonialism in their head sacrificing conscious education to a flow bubble.
17. Is it normal to have natural disasters in Australia? Given the location and settled climate of Australia, it is perfectly normal. Should they break records? It has been always. Is it going to stop? The answer is known to everyone. It is the climate of Australia, climate doesn't change. There is no science to prove that; science will remain unsuccessful to prove any climate change like at present. On coldest years bush fires will burn trees, on hottest years rain will flood the country breaking records. Well, the bogus propaganda should be ready to come up with new climate assumptions apparently. In simple words, there is no possible way to make carbon dioxide liable for global warming, because they live in cold places by nature, sinks in sea waters every night to become food of all green in the sea. In data, global warming does not exist, what exists is a very natural trend of fluctuations of global average temperature at the ground level only for a very limited and random locations which is not science, also does not prove or mean anything to natural science. Well; if you ask permission from PUTIN to waste your money and future on natural disasters. You'll get an extended smile with permission.
18. The agenda we will see about women will prove in which decade Australian women are in. The law already determined that "women will get equal pay when they will do a similar job like a man." You have to look at the law from the perspective that in every industry there is a path of carrier growth with a predetermined salary. No jobs are coming with a tag for men or women but salary and job description only. Now, If new wave wanna shape the law or politics will sound nice to people, will end up in determination by reality which is already in effect. Giving away space to women will remain as a courtesy probably will stuck at the limit of tolerance. The reality is, in Australia, world-class managements are using efficient world-class measures which is called KPI (key performance indicators). If you worked for sales job you understand your KPI is to increase sales to get more incentives and advancement. There are unions and paid HR bodies inside corporates to monitor the measures and review them to maximise the profits and performance named as “productivity”. At the end of this all, employers may become aware to find out if anyone taking advantage of the existing system; if you allocate quota claiming women are incapable to win, no one will ever hire higher than the quota. The reality inside business is, management doesn't have time to look at who is coming with a polished chest or balls. They have their KPIs hanging over their heads to keep their jobs. If you are still in confusion, they usually put all activities inside the business into software to measure the KPI in real-time like stock market share price. The carrier-building process of women in the existing structure also doesn’t have any gender tag. HELP is a higher education loan program for all students in Australia. If you wanna through any new challenges among people with the name of “gender gap (is a medieval term not post-modern)” it must have to be “economically viable”. What it means is, lifting the economy is making you postmodern not juggling ideas in your head out of the economy. Liberal had clear indications in the parliament that 5% tax relief, "early asset write off" for S&M business on top of their flexibility in existing tax treatments will attract more people in Australian legacy business with more income without a gender tag. I must clarify, the gender tag is a medieval idea, in post-modern history, women are taken to be advanced in autonomous/appropriate locations of the economy with free choice. It will be an apprehended bias if some politicians wanna become heroes claiming that women are making mistakes in choosing their educational path or professions. They must look at the scenario that when the economy is lifting to a goal, it is making the process, and opportunities autonomous including everyone in the reality. I name the "taxation system" as a "redistribution system" was exist in society from the beginning of history which is the most natural way to pillar steps toward development. I won't believe Australian women are anywhere less than in the post-mortem world if I was both blind and deaf. As I said earlier, labour policy history advanced us the truth that it will increase unemployment and will make some women rich as prostitutes and strippers, will also increase parasites who will accuse rich men with false pretences to establish that society was the viable excuse for their crimes. Well, the reality is, if you can extinct the parasites you live in a better society with fresh air to breathe. What I can see is some strippers, prostitutes, and casual thieves are trying to manifest a campaign in social media that unknown people lost respect for women just to create a market for their devices gradually entering the court of law and parliament. The existing systems in administration are extincting other than fueling this unlike misguided women agenda. "There are two clear paths in policy, either you put people in trouble with an ease that you'll have some extra help or you help people to avoid trouble". In theory, humans are not material but some functions are. The aggressive fashion of women makes women material out of human society. Similarly Turnbull & Shorten together fueled another disease (pandemic) to disfigure the natural balance of humans and their relations. Gillard & Abbot didn't have drug issues I believe in this particular decision. It is worst than the above parasite which administrations fight by nature to safeguard the mainstream population from turbulence/disturbance. Already disfiguring the young generation with a wasted pattern of media to look for new business every day, will increase and import various crimes in the society with a given guarantee of epidemic disease. I’ll give you one example to understand the disease of media/politics. There are people in society who kill people, they are as normal as others will have some job, will talk and mix normally in society will also have a list of good things they have done in their lives. Society has some duties to deal with these people. But society doesn’t have the power to issue a license to kill other people. The Whole of Western society suffers from this disease which reversed the course of history in the wrong direction with unacceptable bad arguments/logics. They issue a license to one bad thing and then make that as an excuse for licensing all bad things gradually without any moral limitations. There will be always bad things in society, the media or politics took the job to put new labels on them to make money out of those. In capitalism, there is no limit or restrictions to do so rather will reward them as peace-makers sitting on a pile of innocent dead bodies. It will be best that you do not do anything other than increase the number of dead bodies. The follower of Marxism has a moral compass led by the greater good of society as a whole. Ex: In Russia, they agree without confusion that they cannot encourage same-sex marriage by issuing the license.
19. I found it clever that liberals traded off some refugees from US war to US, making US pay Solomon stamping commission back in. Maybe at some point will seek voting in parliament in future (proposed by labour ex-minister) before giving away the life of people in a series of suicide for wars without weighted morals. (https://www.globalresearch.ca/pre-emptive-apologies-tony-blair-and-the-wages-of-spin/5487231)
20. I also found it funny when Morrison alleged that Australian scientists are in business, will invent something to reduce carbon emissions. That has only one perspective, maximising profits of businesses. It is clear that he was unable to sell bogus propaganda or "climate fraud" to a scientist. Labour chooses the people over the business because any bogus thing you can sell to uneducated superstitious people. If you are telling me that "net zero emission in the world will reduce record-breaking natural disasters in future", I will recommend you to read some middle eastern fairy tales, they have better ones that you will enjoy definitely. All you will get is less healthy trees, less oxygen in the air, unhealthy seafood, thinning ozone layer and a massive reduction in wealth to ruin your future.
21. I find it stupid when labour proposed "hedging principle" to use it in the process of buying vaccine in the middle of the pandemic. The administration must be strict about the fact that when people struggling to accept 80% effective Astrogenica vaccine to fight with the situation, how do you plan to invest in the Phizer vaccine which the manufacturer can not claim or prove more than 60% effectiveness. Comparison of risk (supply, side effect) is out of the question until it was proven at least 80% effectiveness in practical. It was asked the manufacturer recently again, they clearly advised that they did not know at that time. What we know now is phyzer could be somewhere 80% effective or more in some cases likely to be increased damage rate if it was used in the older population. In all laws decisions are made at the point of time. If time changes new decisions are added to the policy. In the investment of money, the hedging principle does not deal with the potential death of people up to the present with a 60% effective vaccine. In investment, all investments are taken to be volatile in return so the hedging principle applies. Morrison kept fueling this stupid claim of labour probably to please stubborn media who will prefer labour over the lives of people. As per the record, Morrison was exactly 4 weeks behind with the vaccination schedule because of the late arrival of one Astrogenica supply which was the fault of the supplier only. Phyzer manufacturing and supply were nowhere near Astrogenica. Well, it was recoverable later with homemade Astrogenica but still people want the best to face the pandemic. No stupid should ignore this fact. I don’t wanna speculate on the other claim of labour to bring an early supply of Astrogenica vaccine from dying Europe where the drama ends up finding the exPM of labour as a liar. Other claims by labour during the pandemic had no clear goal like the above one other than re-establishing their wasteful spending habit, wanna spend more on the hospital, any new information coming out from variant research the labour seemed to know everything upfront but was silent, wanted to pay money to people to take vaccine probably saw in the US or somewhere. Well, these types of inconsiderate appeals or false pretence can please some less educated people, did not help the parliamentarians at all who had a perfect plan for vaccination with homemade Astrogenica where a late arrival of the second lot from Europe slowed it for weeks. From practical experience, no one felt no pressure or significant change in the economy or lifestyle other than face masks and restrictions on gatherings. I saw mild complaints against QLD premier and NSW premier; which came to an equilibrium that federal policy from the liberal was just to fund the lockdown at any cost. The whole two years went smoothly up to the completion of the vaccination. I found a list of inconsiderate childishly disturbing claims like why Europeans missed a delivery date of the vaccine breaching contract, and why Putin sparked inflation in the world? Why are people dying in the pandemic? Why medical board doesn’t know about all variants upfront? Disgustingly Childish continued claim that everything was on Morrison’s watch. Well, in reality, Morrison called for the royal commission for an unprecedented bushfire, one culprit was caught who was causing bush fire, Morrison called for royal commission in aged care. Again Morrison seemed to be the criminal who tried to find out what was happened with money in the aged care going from budget. Finally, the unprecedented flood for two years will also need a royal commission to find out how new urbanisation plans should avoid flood-affected areas. This is absolutely a normal process that flood changes it's location over time like all other regular locations of disasters in history. Every country knows that from records. Now, why the flood broken past records? There are opportunistic assumptions only "there is no record of temperature on the ocean where the clouds coming from. Absolutely lying about atomosphere calculating the Albido on the ground which is not exist on the ocean having a completely different world on the ocean with completely different temperature situation, CO2 sinks in the ocean. [Overall, the results suggested that no single factor correlated perfectly with heavy rainfall.] (https://eos.org/research-spotlights/what-causes-heavy-rainfall). From commonsense anyone can say if temperature is high on the ground likely to be comparatively higher on the ocean for the quality and stability of sunlight, movements of clouds winds that day close to the location. They are giving a completely reverse hypothesis conflicting with climate science. Here, in practical climate science, water vapour from ocean flows into ground determines the temperature of ground usually signals humans from the beginning of history that there will be rain. There is no relation with CO2 and temperature of ocean because CO2 sinks in water, CO2 moves away from temperature by nature, there is no Albedo in the ocean, so CO2 doesn't trap no heat on the ocean. During the water evaporation process on the ocean it concentrate O2 from the air. First of all, they must show a record of that ground level if they can proof any increase in CO2 in the air of that ground, I am already confirming you that it will be impossible to show increase of CO2 on the ocean where CO2 sinking every night from ground to become food of greens underneath the sea. They are jumping to bogus assumptions without no records, no data, no evidence whatsoever. Past 100 years data shows a very normal fluctuation of temperature where sometimes they are breaking records of the past everywhere. What is possible ?? If you visit a coal power station on a day, there is a slim chance to show some CO2 in the air of that place for a temporary period of time. Their is a slim chance CO2 will drop like basketball on the ground before sinking in the ocean. [The rise of most hot plumes is caused almost entirely by buoyancy due to heat; CO2 comes@150degree hot from a coal powered chimney] Otherwise nowhere in Australia it is possible to show CO2 in the air. As an anthropologist I offer you absolute science without errors demand to Australian to read my transparency page to justify Australian way of scientific research before you moved by false assumptions. I guarantee no error in Australian way of research findings which is not present in any such fraud climate warnings. If CO2 keeps going upward other than going to ocean via filtering rain water lately, that will be lost in below 0 degree temperature and below 0 density of air will remain impossible to evident any change in literally infinite atmosphere or space/galaxy. [https://www.clientearth.org/latest/latest-updates/stories/what-is-a-carbon-sink/] [https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-the-oceans-are-absorbing-more-carbon-than-previously-thought/] Oceans alone has infinite capacity to consume CO2 emissions from human activities "will keep generating fossil fuel" from CO2 in a solar cycle underneath the sea; keeping the whole galaxy out of equations. [gravity is higher in the oceans; magnitude] This is the most scientific natural process (solar cycle) exists in reality where Carbon emissions do not have any long term negative effect only relocates or changes location in the cycle . Now I must add another hypothesis of flying flow of CO2 passing over earth (https://research.noaa.gov/article/ArtMID/587/ArticleID/2764/Coronavirus-response-barely-slows-rising-carbon-dioxide ) admitted to be at immaterial locations (no number) of the earth making some people employed on top of mountains probably (cold temperature concentrates CO2). They appear to see the billion year old world through natural rust - (??!!) sinked in ice claim to be serious science to make people believe those readings of flying flow have anything to do with world temperature or climate. The measurement scale set to a nano% of airflow literally in an infinite looking world to a human to account a mathematically viewable microscopic insect. In other questions scientists cannot confirm how-long CO2 can live in nature was answered not sure but 5-50-200-300years+[https://www.nature.com/articles/climate.2008.122.pdf]. Here to say this after all other false attempts, this time media become more active to sell their story of fraud climate warning. As usual they go away like bush fire (2014) over time. Now they are ready to gamble future of Australian economy plus a pile of debts just to secure their political platform and income. Hopefully the fraud people will able to show a worm year in past 10 years to claim that worm year is causing today’s disaster. As I said, you can literally sell anything to people if you just come up with a political label preferably from US propaganda. It won't bother anyone even if in US most people rejecting it. Some assumptions are visible in labour massive debt: it will change the present normal course of business and progress, it might reduce some emissions earlier, it will stop energy provider to account their cost in the price of energy, It won’t interrupt other developers who are in business, It won’t end up as a force against developments and progress and won’t wast the debt. Why it is important? Past carbon tax of labour was proven to be force against development and progress in the normal flow of economy. Well, you may waste another legislation with massive burden of debt. Well, if I look at the reality in the chart, I don't see any case against Australian business to force them with unjustifiable pressure. If you look at data, Australia is not exist in most of the charts. Morrison was humiliated by fraud media that Australian business had no right to think about keeping coal business with new invention of quarantine facility, people don't have right to use hydrogen powered vehicles, they must buy battery powered one, no other inventions will be welcomed because "labour has business of 60billion with construction industry; independent candidates will pay huge amount in the market to buy vote in liberal seats, Will make every household pay bills for the rest of their lives because labour believes there is no cost to setup renewable in practical". If you find minimum sense in the charts you'll find all above are for absolutely nothing. Putin already given enough excuses to Europe to avoid bogus climate issues for some decades. Tie of the NATO never changed minds of business in Europe in past 100 years to think about change in fossil fuel other than looking for new source of income. US is not a bit different in the reality of the charts. Morrison appeared to be the culprit who pointed out the facts because everything was in his Watch. As I said, past 100 years climate propaganda was unable to prove or establish anything, there is no data about global worming, no cause related to no effect in gambling with natural disasters. This bullshit is not selling to any scientist anywhere in the world who are in business. Everyone simply looking for opportunities to market some new products and buy carbon credit to keep the propaganda alive for profit. China joined the propaganda just to sell their renewable products in the market. Australian symbol "Muriel's Wedding" can give us insight into where Australians stand probably.
22. Superannuation industry and cash out from super is not a complicated case. I do not believe super can guarantee any amount of return from investment at all. Funds basically go negative paying various accounting and investment costs monthly basis. SMSF is a legacy plus early retirement age already giving access to super to most people. Restricting fist home buyers from this advantage is not wise from any perspective of investment and return. I'm not saying there cannot be extraordinary cases. Price rise in the property market is always good for investors who are prepared to invest. An investment in the property market with less or no deposit is a waste of time. The reality is labour won't admit that people paying rent won't save any money buying home when they are struggling to gather deposit. It means the class of people we are looking at already paying lower rent won't save any money on mortgage. If you ask a mortgage insurer, they will tell you that people can't come with at least 5% deposit will put the property in foreclosure. So they don't insure those from their centuries of experience. Here 5% saving history can justify that the buyer can cope with market changes and rate changes. When the property is forclouser, bank will mostly sell in loss (ASAP) then make the client bankrupt with short fall of debt. I must clarify how the system is designed in the finance industry for centuries. Countries like US banks can do up to 110% loan on a property because banks are allowed to make maximum profit out of a customer, in Australian regulation that is not allowed. This kind of properties go to the foreclosure very frequently if bad years of property market prolongs, but people with stable higher income can recover from this kind of situation when they have other investments with higher yields. A number of people become bankrupt in a time like 2009 when whole investment market performs bad. Good thing is, home loan interest rates in US far less than Australia so extra money to buy car or investment can make situation stable from investment perspective. What it means is, bank doesn't make more money from bigger loan, the home buyer makes from other sources. As I said the finance market can say it upfront which is waste of time for a buyer.
23. It is undeniable that labour targets votes from less educated people mostly may find it easy to accommodate diversified candidates who have some basic knowledge to fly with the flow. Liberal may face struggle to accomodate unknown people in their panel will find it difficult to elect "mentally mature" people. Trillion dollar hand out to low income earners, another trillion tax relief to Australian legacy business, a very successful vaccine campaign in the world, a very successful economic establishment, could not keep liberal in power. Because the weight of less educated people in Australia remaining still. Sometimes you need to put a stubborn generation on trial to find out how stubborn they are. I can't ignore the opinion of Julia Bishop from her observation about votes in Australian politics; "dick swing" is the best way to describe the percentage of primary votes always in favour of liberals in history. Finally can’t forget the claim that real wage is going backward!?? Serious economic term probably in global inflation. When Morrison offered reduction in fuel cost, emergency medicine cost, immediate hand out to poor, it appears labour took a new approach that they will pay more on every occasions. Anyway, will find it soon enough that Australian whole economy is going backward loosing most valuable wealth of fossil fuel. The best way to make some voters educated is liberal should open a new TV channel with 24/7 news to challenge ABC tv where all the day people see some cut piece of random video to show people making complaints about liberal policy. Well, liberal should also pay some spectators to catch some balls out of boundary. They should also invite some judges and justices of the courts to give people real life experience to understand where people is actually living, not face book, instagram or box office. I must be honest, I watched ABC tv every day starting from pandemic to 2022 election, I only got news from prime minister and in genuine administrative announcements and some press conferences from the government. News come clean from government because they basically do not lie. All other seemed to be first year honours students in some TEFE probably. I had similar kind of opinion from a bunch of people I know.
24. It is true that Shouting about refugee women?! will keep some people employed definitely. It is also true that people like to get back to reality and normal life sleeping in peace end of the day.
25. If you can see democracy flourishing in the history (500BC) with a question, " if knowledge is possible" ? You are on the right page which hasn't turned yet. Likely to be in the hands of people who will keep looking for it.
26. I must conclude with another list of inconsiderate claims beyond the minimum standard of civility. Mr porter lost his carrier for a coherent mumble of chronic mental women who literally cost a huge amount of penalty to the media. Well, there are more court decisions are coming. If labour cannot hold the momentum of their present source of gravity, they are making their way to become a party like National with 25seats probably. If they lose people's trust like before, this time might remain irrecoverable. When labour and women taking same face that they are unable to get their right with their highest marit in the existing system, changing system become their only issue. Yes, verbal accusation, allegations, they are basically food of media when they are hungry, should not pillar any establishment in people’s minds. This will misguide people to involve with things will go out of their hands under administration. Assuming some parts of administration may support labour not leaving their job responsibilities. Woman alleged sexual assault in office suit attached to parliament building for convenience of workspace. Sometimes claiming law is equal sometimes dragging it into the side pocket. Sacked the accused straightaway wanna sack senator was sleeping at home denied allegations losing merits and weights all the way. Started bullying other parliamentarians where to file the case, who is the defendant ? Definitely the prime minister who was also sleeping with family at home. Now, media become hungry at their horney moments in description of office suit video behind parliament. Perfect story to stage on public where to go. Tickets are available to voating booths who will win. Still there is no case primemister to file against him. Opposition is plaintiff on behalf of crown with immediate judgment from the king in United States. Let it hang on the stage closing bars for the criminals out large in society. Media is the highest authority to safeguard legal aid for prime minister. Clif hanger swinging up to election before roap become rusty. Broken legal system only can be exist in broken structures of allegation acquisitions piling to the office suit. Wanna leave some rust in the system in open air begging for voter's ballot only.
Abstraction:
